tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7651597981151570147.post3571331861774328723..comments2024-03-15T07:44:55.087+00:00Comments on The Cycling Lawyer: A note on the law: Manslaughter, dangerous cycling and ‘s35 Driving’Martin Porterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07802050121734667593noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7651597981151570147.post-10204348953320282072017-11-24T08:09:53.218+00:002017-11-24T08:09:53.218+00:00Dear Mr Porter,
Could I invite you to comment to ...Dear Mr Porter,<br /><br />Could I invite you to comment to the DfT, about the upcoming "cycling safety review"?<br /><br />From:<br />http://road.cc/content/news/232665-mandatory-hi-vis-and-helmets-will-be-considered-part-government-cycle-safety :<br /><br /><br />PJ McNally [592 posts] 16 hours ago 1 like <br />The Cycling Silk offers the lawyer's view of this one, and is the clearest explanation I've found of the status quo, and the arguments for and against the legal changes suggested in this proposal ("The first phase will look at whether a new offence equivalent to causing death by careless or dangerous driving should be introduced for cyclists") :<br /><br />http://thecyclingsilk.blogspot.co.uk/2017/08/a-note-on-law-manslaughter-... (link is external)<br /><br />I hope he can be invited to comment as part of the review process - in fact perhaps he could submit his article, or even offer his expert opinion to the review? (I'm assuming, as Chris Boardman rightly suggests, there will be an evidence based approach).Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11707029429045303950noreply@blogger.com